If HTML and CSS are so simple, why haven't static sites reigned supreme?
đź”– Bookmarked If HTML and CSS are so simple, why haven't static sites reigned supreme?
Why haven’t static site generators reigned supreme? It's not that HTML and CSS aren’t simple, they both be simple and difficult at the same time. It’s that static site generators are still slightly out of touch with the non developer. Just take a look at what’s getting built across places like Neocities or Nekoweb to get a glance on what non developers are able to do with HTML and CSS and no SSG…
Why haven’t static site generators reigned supreme? It's not that HTML and CSS aren’t simple, they both be simple and difficult at the same time. It’s that static site generators are still slightly out of touch with the non developer. Just take a look at what’s getting built across places like Neocities or Nekoweb to get a glance on what non developers are able to do with HTML and CSS and no SSG…
Reply by email, XMPP, send a webmention, or say what's up in the guestbook.
No mentions yet.
